[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
The following reply was made to PR pkg/46910; it has been noted by GNATS.
Subject: Re: pkg/46910
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 01:46:18 -0400
> Then, at least, this license should be specified with its version,
Agreed. The packages i'm using need version 2.0 of this license.
> and it must be decided whether it is one of the default acceptable license or
What is the criteria for that?
> Temporary, you can put the license file somewhere and specify it as
> LICENSE_FILE in pkg's Makefile.
Certainly. However, i would rather this be decided sooner rather than later
(perhaps before the next stable release of pkgsrc), as it seems a trivial
decision/file addition to licenses/ and would negate the file addition/removal.
Main Index |
Thread Index |