[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkg/46496: lang/scm
The following reply was made to PR pkg/46496; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Aleksey Cheusov <cheusov%tut.by@localhost>
Subject: Re: pkg/46496: lang/scm
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 15:12:53 +0300
>> We could pass -Werror=implicit-function-declaration to gcc in gcc
>> wrapper for "build" target.
> That syntax isn't supported by gcc 4.1.
For testing purposes it is enough to run a bulk build on a single
non-Linux platform (e.g. NetBSD-6) where gcc is new enough.
> Also I don't think the wrappers know how to vary their behavior
> depending on the target.
If we decide to go this way and always fix this kind of failures,
this will not be a serious problem. I don't know if other packaging
systems do something similar but If there is a chance to reduce number
of segfaults automagically, this will not be a useless waste of resources.
However, I cannot even estimate number of such failures.
Best regards, Aleksey Cheusov.
Main Index |
Thread Index |