[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
The following reply was made to PR pkg/46037; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Bernd Ernesti <netbsd%lists.veego.de@localhost>
Subject: Re: pkg/46037
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:55:25 +0100
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 04:20:04PM +0000, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR pkg/46037; it has been noted by GNATS.
> From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Subject: Re: pkg/46037
> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:16:06 +0100
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:55:02PM +0000, OBATA Akio wrote:
> > The following reply was made to PR pkg/46037; it has been noted by GNATS.
> > From: "OBATA Akio" <obache%netbsd.org@localhost>
> > To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
> > Cc:
> > Subject: Re: pkg/46037
> > Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:51:34 +0900
> > On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:50:05 +0900, Bernd Ernesti
> <netbsd%lists.veego.de@localhost> wrote:
> > > IMHO these defines should not be protected at all by $osvers because
> > > this check is always true due too the check for all available NetBSD
> > > versions.
> > Do you think that those reentrant functions will not be implemented
I had no idea that they are already implented since there is no man page
> getprotoent_r and friends do exist. The point is that the check as is is
> pointless. So what does Perl really want to do here?
Hmm, i haven't checked the script and what it does, but just adding 6.*
looked wrong since it would always be true because of the checks for
NetBSD 0.9 till 6.*.
It looks like we got the reentrant functions with NetBSD 2.0 so hints/netbsd.sh
should be changed to reflect this fact.
Main Index |
Thread Index |