[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
pkg/44101: net/couriertcpd distfile checksum error
>Synopsis: net/couriertcpd distfile checksum error
>Arrival-Date: Wed Nov 17 04:25:00 +0000 2010
>Originator: Robert Elz
>Release: NetBSD 5.1_RC3 (irrelevant, but:) pkgsrc current 2010-11-17
Prince of Songkla University
System: NetBSD jade.coe.psu.ac.th 5.1_RC3 NetBSD 5.1_RC3 (JADE-1.12-20100614)
#2: Mon Jun 14 08:35:26 ICT 2010
The distinfo on the master site for net/couriertcpd
(split onto two lines to keep line length reasonable)
does not match the checksum in the distfile.
The copy of the distfile on f.n.o appears to be the same as
the one available on the master site.
Since the mod time on the file fetched is Oct 5, and the
mod time on the last update to the pkgsrc directories is
Oct 16, my guess is that the pkgsrc update was prepared using
an older version of the distfile, and no-one noticed that the
master site changed it (even before we needed it).
mv aside any old (apparently OK) distfile (don't delete it).
Notice that it downloads 7108548 bytes rather than the 7152680
that the distinfo file expects, and that the checksum comparison
Someone who has the distfile that was used to prepare the pkgsrc
update needs to check and see what is different in that version
of the distfile compared to what is now on offer. If the
differences are acceptable, update the distinfo file to match.
Otherwise, put a copy of the distfile we should be using on
f.n.o and rmeove the master site from the makefile.
In the former (more likely) case, I don't think a DIST_SUBDIR
is needed in this case, as it appears that it would have been
impossible for pkgsrc to have ever fetched the old distfile
On the other hand, if we are supposed to go and fetch the old
distfile, then it will need to go in a DIST_SUBDIR.
Main Index |
Thread Index |