[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkg/43465 (devel/boost-libs PLIST incorrect)
The following reply was made to PR pkg/43465; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tim Zingelman <tez%netbsd.org@localhost>
To: Hauke Fath <hauke%espresso.rhein-neckar.de@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, jmmv%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/43465 (devel/boost-libs PLIST incorrect)
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:38:35 -0500
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Tim Zingelman <tez%netbsd.org@localhost>
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Hauke Fath
> <hauke%espresso.rhein-neckar.de@localhost> wrote:
>> At 15:32 Uhr -0500 23.9.2010, Tim Zingelman wrote:
>>>Could you try building with the BUILDLINK_TRANSFORM line added to your
>>>Makefile, and/or provide the errors encountered above the ...failed
>> Hi Tim,
>> thanks for looking at the PR.
>> It took me a while to get the ss20 back to the point where it would atte=
>> to build boost-libs (think: perl upgrade...).
>> Short version of the build outcome: Ading
>> BUILDLINK_TRANSFORM+=3D =A0 rm:-fvisibility=3Dhidden
>> to the package Makefile does not make any difference. I get the exact sa=
>> files listed as on the PLIST, but missing from the file system.
> Could you check what the few lines above:
> "...failed gcc.compile.c++.pch
> in the build output are?
I also just noticed http://gnats.netbsd.org/42746 which may be the
same problem you are seeing... and now that I've finally convinced gcc
4.x to build on solaris, I am seeing that problem too (and not the
visibility issue that only shows up in gcc 3.x) I'm looking at how to
best work around this '-std=3Dc++0x required' problem now.
Main Index |
Thread Index |