Re: pkg/43227: [math/py-rpy] Update to 1.0.3

["OBATA Akio" <obache%netbsd.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/43227; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "OBATA Akio" <obache%netbsd.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/43227: [math/py-rpy] Update to 1.0.3
Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 11:40:09 +0900

 On Sat, 01 May 2010 23:50:04 +0900, wen heping <wenheping%gmail.com@localhost> 
wrote:
 
 >  > Please keep patch file name.
 >  > Your new patch-ab should be patch-aa.
 > If I deleted previous pathc-aa, and create a new patch,
 >  then the new patch's name should be patch-aa but not patch-ab ?
 
 Yes.
 But your deleted patch-aa is for rpy_tools.py, and new patch-ab is
 also for rpy_tools.py, so you should update patch-aa to adapt source changes.
 
 >  > And why patch-ac is required?
 > Without patch-ac, the build will fail.
 
 Is it came from API changes of R?
 
 >  >
 >  > > Important: the patch below is based on R-2.11.0, if you use R-2.10.1=
 >  , please modify the PLIST file with s/2110/2101.
 >  >
 >  > Need following too?
 >  > -BUILDLINK_API_DEPENDS.R+= R>=2.7.0
 >  > +BUILDLINK_API_DEPENDS.R+= R>=2.11.0
 > Actualy, rpy-1.0.3 could build with R-2.8 2.9 2.10 and 2.11,
 >  if build with current R-2.10.1, then the PLIST will include r2101.so,
 >  if with R-2.11.0, the r2110.so
 
 In other words, if you built rpy with R-2.10.1, is it also usable
 with R-2.11.0?
 
 >  > > -.include "../../math/py-Numeric/buildlink3.mk"
 >  > > +.include "../../math/py-numpy/buildlink3.mk"
 >  >
 >  > Where is it came from?
 > the source coder suggested use numpy instead py-Numeric,
 >  you know py-Numeric is depracted.
 
 Thanks.
 
 -- 
 OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost