[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkg/42984 (ghostscript component gsc segfaults when given include without absolute path)
The following reply was made to PR pkg/42984; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "T. M. Pederson" <tmp+nb-spr%disfinite.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: pkg/42984 (ghostscript component gsc segfaults when given
include without absolute path)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:23:47 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:15:06 +0000 (UTC)
David Holland <dholland-pbugs%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR pkg/42984; it has been noted by GNATS.
> From: David Holland <dholland-pbugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
> To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Subject: Re: pkg/42984 (ghostscript component gsc segfaults when given
> include without absolute path)
> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:13:23 +0000
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 05:45:02AM +0000, T. M. Pederson wrote:
> > > Do we just need to pull the commit into 2010Q1 or is there another=
> > > needed?
> > =20
> > I'd checked the patch against 2009Q4, and my systems are busy right =
> > with switching to 2010Q1. When that's out of the way I'll check agai=
> > current to verify. 2010Q2/current will be sufficient; the commit mis=
> > 2010Q1 just took me by surprise is all.
> Ok. Let us/me know...
The 2010Q1 update is out of the way (qt4 takes a while) and I've checked
out ghostscript from -current. ghostscript is now working successfully
with the standard foomatic ppds, and show no other strangeness. The fix
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Main Index |
Thread Index |