[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkg/38651 (libkver won't install in pkg_comp any more)
The following reply was made to PR pkg/38651; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Robert Elz <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost>
Subject: Re: pkg/38651 (libkver won't install in pkg_comp any more)
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:01:50 +0700
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:40:05 +0000 (UTC)
From: David Holland <dholland-pbugs%NetBSD.org@localhost>
| I see 34839, 38230, 38232, 42267, 42789, FWIW.
42267 isn't one of mine (though I commented on it) - there's also
29700 (now closed, but not yet fixed) and 42788 (not a pkg_comp PR,
but very much related, which contains the fix for 29700 - 42788 and
42789 together contain the better fix for this PR (or my opinion
of a better fix anyway). There were also one or two older ones
that did get incorporated.
| since you seem to be one of the main users of pkg_comp,
I'm one of the more vocal users, but I suspect that it is used rather more
than many may suspect, people just don't always mention it. It really is
a great way to build packages - especially for people for whom the bulk
build framework is overkill.
| Maybe an interim solution would be to import a separate pkg_comp_kre?
A pkg_comp2 perhaps - while I have quite a lot of mods - meaningful
exit status from "pkg_comp build" so it can be used in scripts, better
control of output (where it goes and how much is produced - from pkg_comp
itself, and more - aside from those PRs) it isn't nearly enough for
it to get my name associated with it, the vast bulk of what I use is
the same as what is in the standard pkgsrc version.
ps: thanks for re-opening this one - though it really would be nicer to
see it closed again (and fixed...)
Main Index |
Thread Index |