[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Why there is no OSS and non-OSS notice in pkgsrc packages?
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 07:51:36AM -0800, Cem Kayali wrote:
>> I do wonder why there is no variable (ie; ACCAPTABLE_SOURCE=non-OSS) or a
>> subcategory, a notice stating that a pkgrsc software is OSS (Open Source
>> Software) or non-OSS. Is this something not-compatible with NetBSD look?
> All non-OSS licenses have to be explicitly accepted if you want to build
Thanks for the updateç That's good point but is not there any software that
has fully open source code but installing requires a license? I think there
are some with similar to below notices in license file, although it is OSS:
"... used, copied and redistributed without fee for non-commerical purposes
provided that this copyright notice intact...etc etc"
View this message in context:
Sent from the pkgsrc-bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Main Index |
Thread Index |