Re: pkg/37567: in case of indirect-failed, pbulk should mention which dependencies failed

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/37567; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/37567: in case of indirect-failed, pbulk should mention
        which dependencies failed
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:25:47 +0100

 On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:15:00AM +0000, rillig%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
 > >Fix:
 > All dependencies that are not in meta/success should be listed in the
 > bulk log. Those that are in meta/error should be hyperlinks to the
 > package in the report.
 
 I don't like this. It can be a *very* long list and you should fix the
 broken packages anyway, shouldn't you? I have a simple problem to
 visualise this in any useful way.
 
 Joerg