Subject: Re: pkg/35019 (${exec_prefix} not properly expanded in
To: None <jmmv@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org, pkgsrc-bugs@netbsd.org,>
From: Hauke Fath <hf@spg.tu-darmstadt.de>
List: pkgsrc-bugs
Date: 12/20/2006 13:10:03
The following reply was made to PR pkg/35019; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Hauke Fath <hf@spg.tu-darmstadt.de>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: jmmv@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: pkg/35019 (${exec_prefix} not properly expanded in
sysutils/dbus)
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:05:04 +0100
Am 17.12.2006 um 15:29 Uhr +0000 schrieb jmmv@NetBSD.org:
>This was supposedly fixed in a not-so-recent version of dbus.
Not true, at least when I build the -current dbus 1.0.2 in context of
pkgsrc-2006Q3:
D-Bus 1.0.2
==============
prefix: /usr/pkg
>>> exec_prefix: ${prefix} <<<
libdir: /usr/pkg/lib
bindir: /usr/pkg/bin
sysconfdir: /etc/pkg/dbus-1
localstatedir: /var
datadir: /usr/pkg/share
> Could you
>please try this again with a pkgsrc-current tree?
Not this year, since it means setting up a machine and building
everything needed for Evolution.
> (pkgsrc-2006Q4 is about
>to be branched, so I'm not sure fixing the problem in 2006Q3 is worth it.)
Until now, we've gone with every second stable pkgsrc branch, since
updating a complete pkgsrc installation is complex and tricky, and
accompanied by fallout. So, even if we were to stick with pkgsrc
(we're going to move to Debian), we would not switch to the new
branch quickly.
The message that non-fatal-bug fixes will not be pulled up even on a
live stable branch is interesting, though, to say the least...
hauke
--
The ASCII Ribbon Campaign Hauke Fath
() No HTML/RTF in email Institut für Nachrichtentechnik
/\ No Word docs in email TU Darmstadt
Respect for open standards Ruf +49-6151-16-3281