Re: pkg/31458 (mk/ghostscript.mk snubs ghostscript-afpl)

To: pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost, pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, jlam%netbsd.org@localhost, nbgnats%anastigmatix.net@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/31458 (mk/ghostscript.mk snubs ghostscript-afpl)
From: jlam%netbsd.org@localhost
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 05:00:05 +0000 (UTC)

Synopsis: mk/ghostscript.mk snubs ghostscript-afpl

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: jlam%netbsd.org@localhost
State-Changed-When: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 05:00:03 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
I believe that this was fixed when ghostscript run-time dependency
handling was moved into the tools framework, e.g. USE_TOOLS+=gs:run.
Can you verify that ghostscript-afpl can indeed by used by ghostscript-
using packages?  Thanks!

Prev by Date: Re: pkg/30423 (Don't use non-portable PRIu64 in pkgtools)
Next by Date: Re: pkg/32269 (samba 3-0.14a from pkgsrc does not hndle "hide special file" correct)
Previous by Thread: Re: pkg/30423 (Don't use non-portable PRIu64 in pkgtools)
Next by Thread: Re: pkg/31458 (mk/ghostscript.mk snubs ghostscript-afpl)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index