Subject: Re: pkg/33428: broken package wm/icecc fix
To: None <pkg-manager@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: None <joerg@britannica.bec.de>
List: pkgsrc-bugs
Date: 05/08/2006 19:55:01
The following reply was made to PR pkg/33428; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: joerg@britannica.bec.de
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: jlam@pkgsrc.org
Subject: Re: pkg/33428: broken package wm/icecc fix
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 21:53:02 +0200
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 06:25:02PM +0000, Iain Hibbert wrote:
> > I want to make sure the environment we talk about is consistent.
> > You normlly don't have to create a PR for a problem in a bulk build, if
> > you don't actually run the package :-)
>
> Well, I am marked as the maintainer..
Sorry, my fault.
/me goes mumbling about adding the real name to the maintainer addresses
for pkgsrc to avoid this kind of problems.
>
> > Which version of patch-aa do you currently have?
>
> it is v1.2 and the cvs date of the pkgsrc was last week sometime ..
OK, so we talk about the same problem. While I don't think that the
patch is wrong, it should not be needed since PTHREAD_LIBS +
PTHREAD_LDFLAGS should be self-contained in my understanding. If it is
missing the rpath entry e.g. in case of pth, this looks wrong.
Johnny, what do you think?
Joerg