Subject: Re: pkg/33428: broken package wm/icecc fix
To: None <pkg-manager@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: None <joerg@britannica.bec.de>
List: pkgsrc-bugs
Date: 05/08/2006 19:55:01
The following reply was made to PR pkg/33428; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: joerg@britannica.bec.de
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: jlam@pkgsrc.org
Subject: Re: pkg/33428: broken package wm/icecc fix
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 21:53:02 +0200

 On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 06:25:02PM +0000, Iain Hibbert wrote:
 >  >  I want to make sure the environment we talk about is consistent.
 >  >  You normlly don't have to create a PR for a problem in a bulk build, if
 >  >  you don't actually run the package :-)
 >  
 >  Well, I am marked as the maintainer..
 
 Sorry, my fault.
 
 /me goes mumbling about adding the real name to the maintainer addresses
 for pkgsrc to avoid this kind of problems.
 
 >  
 >  >  Which version of patch-aa do you currently have?
 >  
 >  it is v1.2 and the cvs date of the pkgsrc was last week sometime ..
 
 OK, so we talk about the same problem. While I don't think that the
 patch is wrong, it should not be needed since PTHREAD_LIBS +
 PTHREAD_LDFLAGS should be self-contained in my understanding. If it is
 missing the rpath entry e.g. in case of pth, this looks wrong.
 
 Johnny, what do you think?
 
 Joerg