The following reply was made to PR pkg/32960; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Gilles Dauphin <Gilles.Dauphin@enst.fr>
To: pkg-manager@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org, dauphin@enst.fr,
	gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/32960: www/htdig-devel kdebase3 Solaris10 gcc 3.4.3
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 15:35:15 +0100 (CET)

 > Delivered-To: dauphin@enst.fr
 > From: joerg@britannica.bec.de
 > To: pkg-manager@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org, pkgsrc-bugs@netbsd.org, 
 "Gilles Dauphin" <dauphin@enst.fr>
 > Subject: Re: pkg/32960: www/htdig-devel kdebase3 Solaris10 gcc 3.4.3
 > X-Gnats-Was-Stupid: no
 > Cc: 
 > X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at enst.fr
 > 
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/32960; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: joerg@britannica.bec.de
 > To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
 > Cc: 
 > Subject: Re: pkg/32960: www/htdig-devel kdebase3 Solaris10 gcc 3.4.3
 > Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:42:25 +0100
 > 
 >  On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:10:04AM +0000, Gilles Dauphin wrote:
 >  >  CXXFLAGS+=              -std=c99
 >  >  CFLAGS+=                -std=c99
 >  
 >  This feels wrong, at least the former. Is there something like
 >  _GNU_SOURCE on Solaris to turn the C99 features for C++ on?
 >  Can you also check whether the failing sets e.g. _POSIX_SOURCE
 >  explicitly?
 >  
 >  Joerg
 
 You are right the compile fail. 
 The CXXFLAGS is wrong, does not exist for g++, 
 How to define 'bool' correctly in htdig?
 
 Gilles