Re: pkg/28392

[Roland Illig <roland.illig%gmx.de@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/28392; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Roland Illig <roland.illig%gmx.de@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/28392
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:26:26 +0200

 Thomas Klausner wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/28392; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Cc: 
 > Subject: Re: pkg/28392
 > Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:00:35 +0200
 > 
 >  On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 09:57:01AM +0000, Roland Illig wrote:
 >  >  Instead of MAKEFILE I suggested BUILD_MAKEFILE, INSTALL_MAKEFILE, 
 >  >  TEST_MAKEFILE once ago.
 >  
 >  It's not usually the case that one package needs three different
 >  Makefiles, dependin on the phase. I can't think of a single package
 >  that would take advantage of this. So perhaps this is not the best
 >  generalization :)
 
 The packages that use <bsd.prog.mk> often have a separate do-install 
 target defined in the package Makefile. But this is more a bug in 
 <bsd.prog.mk> than in the name of the MAKEFILE variable.
 
 Roland