Subject: Re: pkg/28392
To: None <pkg-manager@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Roland Illig <roland.illig@gmx.de>
List: pkgsrc-bugs
Date: 06/06/2005 10:27:02
The following reply was made to PR pkg/28392; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Roland Illig <roland.illig@gmx.de>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: pkg/28392
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:26:26 +0200
Thomas Klausner wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR pkg/28392; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Thomas Klausner <wiz@NetBSD.org>
> To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: pkg/28392
> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:00:35 +0200
>
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 09:57:01AM +0000, Roland Illig wrote:
> > Instead of MAKEFILE I suggested BUILD_MAKEFILE, INSTALL_MAKEFILE,
> > TEST_MAKEFILE once ago.
>
> It's not usually the case that one package needs three different
> Makefiles, dependin on the phase. I can't think of a single package
> that would take advantage of this. So perhaps this is not the best
> generalization :)
The packages that use <bsd.prog.mk> often have a separate do-install
target defined in the package Makefile. But this is more a bug in
<bsd.prog.mk> than in the name of the MAKEFILE variable.
Roland