The following reply was made to PR pkg/28392; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Thomas Klausner <wiz@NetBSD.org>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/28392
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:00:35 +0200

 On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 09:57:01AM +0000, Roland Illig wrote:
 >  Instead of MAKEFILE I suggested BUILD_MAKEFILE, INSTALL_MAKEFILE, 
 >  TEST_MAKEFILE once ago.
 
 It's not usually the case that one package needs three different
 Makefiles, dependin on the phase. I can't think of a single package
 that would take advantage of this. So perhaps this is not the best
 generalization :)
  Thomas