Subject: Re: pkg/25390
To: Dan McMahill <email@example.com>
From: Christian Hattemer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/19/2005 19:21:46
On 19.05.05, you wrote:
>> Perhaps the note that the file is up to date shouldn't appear when it
>> has just been created before. Also, the ouput of this stage could look
>> like the output of the previous cache file stage.
Maybe it wasn't clear, but additionally to removing the "file updated" note
I ment to change "Creating master cache file" to "Missing master cache
file. ... will be generated." to match the wording of the first stage. Or
the other way round. But it's not really an issue. Change it or leave it at
Please also reset the feedback state in the PR.