Re: pkg/23425

[Andrew Brown <atatat%atatdot.net@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/23425; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Brown <atatat%atatdot.net@localhost>
To: Rob Quinn <rquinn%sec.sprint.net@localhost>
Cc: wiz%netbsd.org@localhost, pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost, 
pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
        gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/23425
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:21:02 -0500

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 11:49:09AM -0500, Rob Quinn wrote:
 >> (1) it already prints out a warning saying that it might not work and
 >> then tries anyway.  case in point, my 2.99.14 lsof works fine on
 >> 2.99.16.  i'll try it on 3.99.1 tomorrow.  :)
 >> (2) if we make it refuse to work if the kernel version is different,
 >> we eliminate a great many cases where it might work anyway.
 >
 > I don't want to force either to stop working, I would just like them to show
 >up in "lintpkgsrc -i" as out of date.
 
 well, i wouldn't be opposed to doing something like this:
 
     -PKGNAME=          ${DISTNAME:S/_/-/}
     +PKGNAME=          ${DISTNAME:S/_/-/}-${OS_VERSION}
 
 if that would work properly and have the desired effect (and little to
 no side-effects), but be forewarned -- if you use the -E/-I options of
 lintpkgsrc, this won't show up as out of date quite so readily.
 
 -- 
 |-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
 codewarrior%daemon.org@localhost             * "ah!  i see you have the 
internet
 twofsonet%graffiti.com@localhost (Andrew Brown)                that goes 
*ping*!"
 werdna%squooshy.com@localhost       * "information is power -- share the 
wealth."