Subject: Re: pkg/23425
To: None <atatat@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org, pkgsrc-bugs@netbsd.org>
From: Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net>
List: pkgsrc-bugs
Date: 03/31/2005 08:40:02
The following reply was made to PR pkg/23425; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net>
To: Rob Quinn <rquinn@sec.sprint.net>
Cc: wiz@netbsd.org, pkg-manager@netbsd.org, pkgsrc-bugs@netbsd.org,
	gnats-admin@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: pkg/23425
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:21:02 -0500

 On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 11:49:09AM -0500, Rob Quinn wrote:
 >> (1) it already prints out a warning saying that it might not work and
 >> then tries anyway.  case in point, my 2.99.14 lsof works fine on
 >> 2.99.16.  i'll try it on 3.99.1 tomorrow.  :)
 >> (2) if we make it refuse to work if the kernel version is different,
 >> we eliminate a great many cases where it might work anyway.
 >
 > I don't want to force either to stop working, I would just like them to show
 >up in "lintpkgsrc -i" as out of date.
 
 well, i wouldn't be opposed to doing something like this:
 
     -PKGNAME=		${DISTNAME:S/_/-/}
     +PKGNAME=		${DISTNAME:S/_/-/}-${OS_VERSION}
 
 if that would work properly and have the desired effect (and little to
 no side-effects), but be forewarned -- if you use the -E/-I options of
 lintpkgsrc, this won't show up as out of date quite so readily.
 
 -- 
 |-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
 codewarrior@daemon.org             * "ah!  i see you have the internet
 twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"
 werdna@squooshy.com       * "information is power -- share the wealth."