The following reply was made to PR pkg/29194; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de>
To: Rui-Xiang Guo <rxg@myrealbox.com>
Cc: pkg-manager@netbsd.org, pkgsrc-bugs@netbsd.org,
	gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: pkg/29194 (mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap)
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:21:23 +0100 (CET)

 On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Rui-Xiang Guo wrote:
 >> Do you know where I could get "bsmilp03"? It doesn't seem to be in any of
 >> the teTeX2 or cjk* pkgs.
 >
 > bsmilp03 is TFM font which generated by ttf2tfm from arphic-ttf.
 > I have fixed the path properly in cjk-latex, please test it, thanks.
 
 I have reinstalled cjk-latex and cjk-latex-chinese from latest pkgsrc-wip, 
 but still get the same error. The cjk-latex-chinese PLIST only lists 
 bsmi00* but no bsmilp. Is this caused by the ttf2pk chance you propose?
 
 
 > But we still need to tweak ttf2pk with this patch -
 > -                       ${TOUCH}                ${TEXMF}/ttf2tfm/base/ttfonts.map
 > -share/texmf/ttf2tfm/base/ttfonts.map
 > Because ttfonts.map will be generated by cjk-latex.
 
 I wonder what happens when other pkgs need to use ttf2pk and want to add 
 entries for ttfonts.map? Adding an empty file in ttf2pk that everyone can 
 add and that ttf2pk cleans up seems to make more sense here than adding it 
 in some random package. But maybe the file should be part of teTeX instead 
 of ttf2pk?
 
 
 > btw, what's the reason that you intend to change the pkg's name?
 
 What do you mean here? shouldb't the PKGNAME be set to ttf2pk?
 
 
   - Hubert
 
 -- 
 NetBSD - Free AND Open!      (And of course secure, portable, yadda yadda)