Subject: Re: pkg/29254: cyclic depandancy between devel/libtool && libtool-base and devel/pth
To: None <pkg-manager@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: grant beattie <grant@NetBSD.org>
List: pkgsrc-bugs
Date: 02/09/2005 07:27:02
The following reply was made to PR pkg/29254; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: grant beattie <grant@NetBSD.org>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: pkg-manager@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
pkgsrc-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: pkg/29254: cyclic depandancy between devel/libtool && libtool-base and devel/pth
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:26:52 +1100
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 03:08:01PM +0000, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> From: Thomas Klausner <wiz@NetBSD.org>
> To: ole.hellqvist@spray.se
> Cc: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
> Subject: Re: pkg/29254: cyclic depandancy between devel/libtool && libtool-base and devel/pth
> Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:06:48 +0100
>
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:56:00PM +0000, ole.hellqvist@spray.se wrote:
> > Downloaded the pkgsrc.tar.gz today at 14:00, got the error caused by recycled depandancies beetween devel/libtool-base and devel/pth.
>
> Why do you need pth on 2.0?
> 2.0 comes with a pthread library; pth is just a replacement library
> needed on systems which don't have one.
I think (part of) the point is that this was not detected correctly
by pkgsrc, and it tried to pull in pth.
grant.