The following reply was made to PR pkg/26170; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
To: Thorsten Frueauf <milano@zhadum.de>
Cc: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: pkg/26170
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:35:28 +0100

 --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Disposition: inline
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 hi,
 
 On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 03:30:15PM +0100, Thorsten Frueauf wrote:
 > > the option should be called "kerberos", not "kerberos5" to be
 > > consistent with the rest of pkgsrc.
 >=20
 > Well, there was already an entry for kerberos4 (not coming from me) in
 > options.mk for fetchmail. So for me it is more consistent to then use
 > kerberos5 - not kerberos, since the version matters?
 
 the current practice is:
 
  kerberos4 for Kerberos 4
  kerberos  for Kerberos 5
 
 i don't recall any discusion about it, perhaps ask jlam@.
 
 
 regards,
 
 --=20
 -- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@{NetBSD,Xtrmntr,silcnet}.org>   --
 
 --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
 Content-Disposition: inline
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)
 
 iD8DBQFB78GwiwjDDlS8cmMRAr/BAJ9alD68KowFhZVlTqtBXVhRYrtWDwCfe0bI
 uApo6Kzbp5JRYiOnvdvUo/Q=
 =8G2h
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX--