pkg/28917: cad/gschem won't build

[dgriffi%cs.csubak.edu@localhost]

>Number:         28917
>Category:       pkg
>Synopsis:       cad/gschem won't build
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       high
>Responsible:    pkg-manager
>State:          open
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Jan 09 06:30:00 +0000 2005
>Originator:     David Griffith
>Release:        2.0 / i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
NetBSD zaphod 2.0 NetBSD 2.0 (GENERIC) #0: Wed Dec  1 10:58:25 UTC 2004  
builds@build:/big/builds/ab/netbsd-2-0-RELEASE/i386/200411300000Z-obj/big/builds/ab/netbsd-2-0-RELEASE/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
 i386

>Description:
The current gEDA suite is version 20040111; almost a year old.  One of its 
components, gschem, has build problems.  Trying to build pkgsrc/cad/gschem 
directly or by dependency (pkgsrc/cad/geda), yields this:

In file included from ../noweb/a_pan.nw:56:
../include/prototype.h:30: error: conflicting types for `g_key_file_new'
/usr/tmp/pkg_build/cad/gschem/work.zaphod/.buildlink/include/glib/glib-2.0/glib/gkeyfile.h:53:
 error: previous declaration of `g_key_file_new'
*** Error code 1

Stop.
make: stopped in 
/usr/tmp/pkg_build/cad/gschem/work.zaphod/geda-gschem-20040111/src
*** Error code 1

Stop.
make: stopped in 
/usr/tmp/pkg_build/cad/gschem/work.zaphod/geda-gschem-20040111/src
*** Error code 1

Stop.
make: stopped in /usr/tmp/pkg_build/cad/gschem/work.zaphod/geda-gschem-20040111
*** Error code 1

Stop.
make: stopped in /usr/tmp/pkg_build/cad/gschem/work.zaphod/geda-gschem-20040111
*** Error code 1

Stop.
make: stopped in /usr/pkgsrc/cad/gschem
*** Error code 1

Stop.
make: stopped in /usr/pkgsrc/cad/gschem
zaphod:/usr/pkgsrc/cad/gschem$ 
>How-To-Repeat:
Simply try to rebuild pkgsrc/cad/gschem.  FWIW, this problem happened exactly 
as before under NetBSD 1.6.2.  I upgraded thinking that would fix the problem.  
No dice.
>Fix:
An upgrade to Release 20041228 would probably be best.  I'm trying to hack the 
geda packages to do this, but would the maintainer please take a look?