Subject: RE: Doscmd?
To: Zachary Kline <email@example.com>
From: De Zeurkous <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/15/2007 23:19:10
On Sat, December 15, 2007 23:05, Zachary Kline wrote:
> "De Zeurkous" <email@example.com> wrote in message
> Unfortunately, Dosbox works even less well with a screen reader
It's funny. My mind left out the words 'screen reader' during my first
read, and the entire message still made /exact/ sense, except for the
OpenGL bit. Go figure.
> than does
> running the things natively in the XP command prompt. For some reason,
> applications have a lot of trouble with that in general, as do OpenGL and
> whatever the heck else they have now. Low-level graphics access is no
Indeed. We should have a compat_messdos instead of doscmd, which should
intercept any writes to character memory and deliver them to stdout.
# Proud -net.kook- IRC bot overengineer
% NetBSD, zsh, twm, nvi and roff junkie
From the fool file:
I don't see why the way people have historically partitioned disks should
dictate which kernels we build and distribute by default in the future.
--Darren Reed (darrenr@NetBSD.org), NetBSD tech-kern