Subject: FU: RE: Advanced power management in atactl(8)
To: None <netbsd-users@netbsd.org>
From: De Zeurkous <zeurkous@nichten.info>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 11/18/2007 21:52:36
s/'s/provides the better performance/providest the best performance/'>
s/provides the better performance/provides the best performance/'/ :X
On Sun, November 18, 2007 21:50, De Zeurkous wrote:
> Haai,
>
> Out of pure, unadulterated boredom, some pedantry concerning the manual:
>
> On Sun, November 18, 2007 13:59, Marco Trillo wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Controls the Advanced Power Management feature of the
>> speci-
>> fied device. Advanced Power Management is an optional
>> feature
>> used to specify a power management level to balance
>> between
>> device performance and power consumption.
>>
>> disable Disable the Advanced Power Management.
>>
>> set # Enable the Advanced Power Management
>> feature
>> and set its level to the value #, where
>> #
>> is
>> an integer within the scale 0-253; being
>> 0
>> the
>> mode with the lowest power consumption
>> (and
>> thus the worse performance)
>
> s/and thus the worse performance/and thus providing the worst performance/
>
>> and 253 the
>> mode
>> which provides the better performance at
>> a
>> cost of more power consumption.
>
> s/provides the better performance/providest the best performance/
> s/at a cost/at the cost/
>
>>
>> It should be noted that the effect of
>> the
>
> s/It should be noted/Note that/
>
>> value need not be continous. For
>> example,
>
> s/continous/continuous/
>
>> a
>> device might provide only two modes: one
>> from
>> 0 to 126 and other from 127 to 253. Per
>> the
>> specification, values of 127 and higher
>> do
>> not
>> permit the device to spin down to save
>> power.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> NetBSD 4.0_RC3 April 12, 2005 NetBSD
>> 4.0_RC3
>>
>>[snip patch]
>
> Baai,
>
> De Zeurkous
> -----------
>
> Friggin' Machines!
>
> --
> % NetBSD, zsh, twm, nvi and roff junkie
> From the fool file:
> I don't see why the way people have historically partitioned disks should
> dictate which kernels we build and distribute by default in the future.
> --Darren Reed (darrenr@NetBSD.org), NetBSD tech-kern
>
>
--
% NetBSD, zsh, twm, nvi and roff junkie
From the fool file:
I don't see why the way people have historically partitioned disks should
dictate which kernels we build and distribute by default in the future.
--Darren Reed (darrenr@NetBSD.org), NetBSD tech-kern