Subject: RC1 problem Re: a very slow 2.2Ghz amd64
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: George Georgalis <email@example.com>
Date: 10/05/2007 11:41:43
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 10:38:25AM -0400, George Georgalis wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 07:33:10PM -0000, De Zeurkous wrote:
>>On Thu, October 4, 2007 18:56, George Georgalis wrote:
>>> viaide0 at pci0 dev 6 function 0
>>> viaide0: NVIDIA nForce4 IDE Controller (rev. 0xf2)
>>Your very problem, right there. The nForce ATA controllers are complete
>>crap. Known issue, go bug 'NVIDIA' about it...
>well the thing is, I have an identical box in production with
>netbsd-3 and it doesn't have a problem compared to this RC1 box.
>I looked in BIOS but didn't see any "sata emulate pata" options.
>maybe the bios is different on this box. I'm going to try
>rebuilding this host with -3 and see if I get any improvement.
Absolutely! This box runs 20 times faster with 3.1
NetBSD rock 3.1 NetBSD 3.1 (GENERIC) #0: Mon Oct 30 21:47:28 UTC 2006 firstname.lastname@example.org:/home/builds/ab/netbsd-3-1-RELEASE/amd64/200610302053Z-obj/home/builds/ab/netbsd-3-1-RELEASE/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC amd64
I presume it's a nForce4 IDE issue, but in any event the syncer
seems to remain busy and sys cpu utilization remains high (almost
exclusive) with 4_RC1.
Can anyone give me more specific clues (file) to blame on a PR?
(I can't get RC2 yet, amd64 iso url would be appreciated.)
George Georgalis, information system scientist <IXOYE><