Subject: Re: /usr/local in PATH
To: NetBSD Users's Discussion List <netbsd-users@netbsd.org>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@planix.com>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 09/30/2007 12:56:15
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sun_Sep_30_12:56:14_2007-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
At Sun, 30 Sep 2007 02:53:52 +0000, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
Subject: Re: /usr/local in PATH
>=20
> Third -- lack of system maintainability is itself a security risk,
> because it makes it harder to upgrade when that's needed.
That's a very good point -- I think it's more or less what I was trying
to get at in the first place about having /usr/local and it's underlying
structure documented, at least as a guide, in hier(7).
The other points you've raised are also very good arguments for
reversing the removal of /usr/local and it's creation from the base
system mtree files and installation procedures.
If one tries to make a system too clean and with too much internalized
navel gazing one ends up with something like POSIX which cannot be used
on its own for any real-world purpose, and which probably cannot even
stand up on its own.
--=20
Greg A. Woods
H:+1 416 218-0098 W:+1 416 489-5852 x122 VE3TCP RoboHack <woods@robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com> Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sun_Sep_30_12:56:14_2007-1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
MessageID: hVQgJ2tAbGvh0Dj4VtxtB+3s7h17Vahe
iQA/AwUBRv/VL2Z9cbd4v/R/EQKl+ACgigpY34CVwOim24BHKYl6FuQKoskAoOw+
oh8oMV7e7vtwKVyMOv76q1K9
=tLY2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sun_Sep_30_12:56:14_2007-1--