--Signature=_Fri__24_Aug_2007_10_21_41_+0200_Qtyy.xYTKWr7VpJ2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Salut,

On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:03:09 +0200, Johnny Billquist
<bqt@softjar.se> wrote:
> The gist of the article is otherwise to not write scripts in any shell, b=
ut to=20
> use Perl or something similar instead (hey, the guy who wrote it is/was a=
 Perl=20
> consultant). But sh-advocates just jump on the "don't write in csh" as an=
=20
> argument pro sh. :-)

Actually, my argument pro sh is: if you write POSIX shell code, it will
work on any system except Solaris. If you go into Bashisms or kshisms,
you lose.

aw
--=20
Andr=E9 Wienck <awienck@solnet.ch>

--Signature=_Fri__24_Aug_2007_10_21_41_+0200_Qtyy.xYTKWr7VpJ2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)
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=MQgr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Fri__24_Aug_2007_10_21_41_+0200_Qtyy.xYTKWr7VpJ2--