Subject: Re: NetBSD 4.0
To: Geert Hendrickx <ghen@telenet.be>
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Przemys=B3aw_Pawe=B3czyk?= <pp@kv.net.pl>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 06/30/2007 19:12:52
--Signature=_Sat__30_Jun_2007_19_12_52_-0500_omTzjh6m30JMGDf9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:37:11 +0200
Geert Hendrickx <ghen@telenet.be> wrote:

> Also, testing upgrades from 3.x (or older) to 4.0_BETA2 is as
> important as testing fresh installations.  If you have a 3.x system
> which you can afford to take off-line, make a backup, upgrade it, and
> make notes of what works and what doesn't (esp. things like
> sendmail->postfix or sendmail-> sendmail-from-pkgsrc migration)

Hi,

A propos errors. I wrote a post about RapidSVN errors.
http://mail-index.NetBSD.org/netbsd-users/2007/06/28/0002.html

Matthias Scheler answered:
> > rapidsvn: Error detected by libpthread: Mutex not locked in
> > condition wait. Detected by file
> > "/home/builds/ab/netbsd-3-1-RELEASE/src/lib/libpthread/pthread_cond.c",
> > line 111, function "pthread_cond_wait".

> S That's a bug in the application.

One of my Polish co-workers said just contrary - it has to be NetBSD
error as it is threads' synchronization problem.

Very serious matter and no one paid attention to the post. I didn't
provide a patch, I only pointed to a problem. Did I help or make a
noise?

Regards,
pp

-- Przemysław Pawełczyk (p2o2) - pp_o2@o2.pl P2O2 -
> http://pp.kv.net.pl, P2O2 Forum - http://www.p2o2.fora.pl/

--Signature=_Sat__30_Jun_2007_19_12_52_-0500_omTzjh6m30JMGDf9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFGhvGED9+eS/1tsfYRAsRPAJ9ziV1asYslp9FhnpqIl0LliVS73ACfUO78
/s+tMQupoSjXDjPSv7JYtgk=
=RpLU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Sat__30_Jun_2007_19_12_52_-0500_omTzjh6m30JMGDf9--