Subject: Re: question about NetBSD syslog
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Jeremy C. Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/24/2007 15:39:13
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Michael van Elst wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:10:38PM -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > Further in the same email you quoted from he said the same thing you
> > said.
Fair enough. We understand things differently.
You said: "This just drops a valuable feature: logging events to
multiple destinations independently."
His same posting followed your quoted part with his better example where
he made it optional. He already knew it logged to multiple destinations --
that is what his entire thread was about in the first place.
The other part of your email was about logging not being able to log low
priority events only -- but I already replied that feature is available
By the way, if any of you think that Aleksey's idea to make it optional to
only log to first match is acceptable, I will test and provide a patch.
Jeremy C. Reed