On Thu, 24 May 2007, Michael van Elst wrote:

> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:10:38PM -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> 
> > Further in the same email you quoted from he said the same thing you 
> > said.
> 
> nonsense.

Fair enough. We understand things differently.

You said: "This just drops a valuable feature: logging events to
multiple destinations independently."

His same posting followed your quoted part with his better example where 
he made it optional. He already knew it logged to multiple destinations -- 
that is what his entire thread was about in the first place.

The other part of your email was about logging not being able to log low 
priority events only -- but I already replied that feature is available 
(available twice).

By the way, if any of you think that Aleksey's idea to make it optional to 
only log to first match is acceptable, I will test and provide a patch.

  Jeremy C. Reed