Subject: Re: unkillable mt(1) process
To: Geert Hendrickx <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Brian A. Seklecki <email@example.com>
Date: 05/14/2007 08:42:01
How about "scsictl detach" and rescan?
I know the problem you're talking about, though, I've seen it. A
process blocks all signals until it comes out of a kernel sysctl or I/O
I shy away from direct use of mt(1) if I can. Its worth looking into.
My guess is st(4) dealing with failures, not mt(1).
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 09:41 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
Brian A. Seklecki <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Collaborative Fusion, Inc.
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.