Subject: Re: Connecting IP-based printer?
To: Brian Grayson <email@example.com>
From: Johnny Billquist <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/17/2007 12:45:19
Don't know for sure, but perhaps using rp and rm is better than using
lp. Using lp, I wonder which remote printer the output will go to...?
Brian Grayson wrote:
> I purchased a Brother MFC-665CW printer/fax/etc. box recently, and have
> it working wirelessly with the Windows half of the home network.
> I noticed that when I telnet in to the printer, it mentions support for
> lpr/lpd protocol, which looks promising. If I add the following
> /etc/printcap entry, _something_ happens, but it doesn't print:
> Via the printer's telnet interface, I can see that it logs a
> connection each time I do an lpr, and lpq dequeues the job, but it does
> not print, and the printer's interface doesn't increment 'files printed'.
> So I guess I have a few questions:
> - anything obviously wrong? From lpq's point of view, the job is
> printed and gone, so obviously _it_ is happy.
> - a tcpdump of the IP connection shows a lot of gibberish text. Is
> there any verbose mode to lpd (or any other tool) that can show in more
> detail what it is doing? I altered pstatus to also syslog its output,
> and the last it prints is "Sending to email@example.com"
> The documentation with the printer is of course slanted to M$ and
> MacOS, and online I only see stuff about LPRng and Linux, and not Plain
> Ol' Unix.