--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 01:37:32PM +0100, Dieter wrote:
> Greg A. Woods writes:
>=20
> > Then for the real test start over and do it all again, but this time
> > after "systat bufcache" shows that most of available RAM is used up
> > for metadata an file data, pull the power plugs.  Then try to clean
> > up the mess.
>=20
> What mess?  My understanding is that with soft updates, the only
> thing that can possibly happen is that disk space can be lost.
> The background fsck is for reclaiming this lost space.

That's both the idea and the promise. For better or worse, that has not=20
been the experience of a number of users.

Take care,

Bill

--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFGFrgjWz+3JHUci9cRAjWGAJ4lDN3tcICkwMx5GIT9v59O75bfowCbBIJo
EfJOOcPB0zkM+gPYtjA9nB8=
=we0N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw--