Subject: Re: 3.1 CVS tag question
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: =?UTF-8?B?UHJ6ZW15c8WCYXcgUGF3ZcWCY3p5aw==?= <email@example.com>
Date: 04/02/2007 08:21:23
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 08:57:54 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > What about less branching?
> You're suggesting that we should not fix bugs in the previous major
> release of NetBSD?
> Even if this were a good idea (and I doubt anyone but you thinks it
> is) it would require _more_ tags per branch, not less, since each
> major release requires a -base tag, while minor releases are made
> from the head of the underlying major release branch.
"Less branching" meant less branching, e.g. 3.0, 3.1, 4.0, etc.
> Again, I suggest that you might want to get some experience actually
> doing this before you act so certain that you know how to tell others
> how to do it.
I didn't say I was more experienced to do this or that. I wrote about
something totaly different, whatever visiously. You are trully talented
with dodging skill.
Lasse wrote recently:
"For some reason I am not surprised that this has changed into a
discussion of formats. Somehow whenever there is a discussion on a
difficult subject, the easy way out is to start discussing syntax,
notation or format.
Personally I don't think it is the tools that matter. The problem is
more of a political or temperamental one."
You are the example.
Przemysław Pawełczyk <email@example.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----