--Signature=_Sat__31_Mar_2007_08_31_29_-0500_8Khqy552pqW.5v7n
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 08:04:53 -0500
Przemysław Pawełczyk <pp@kv.net.pl> wrote:

> But the NetBSD documentation reckon as a whole shows deficiency. I
> have a vision what I think would improve NetBSD documentation because
> I did WWWs and wikis in my life, and I'm active Internet user from
> 90s. And tell me now please, with all my good will and the
> "wonderfull" vision [ ;-) ] to who's doors I should knock at? NetBSD
> Project's mailing list has forked into zillions subcategories that
> What I've chosen to have been heard the only selection at those
> circumstation - netbsd-users@ What about netbsd-docs@? Is it equally
> "populated"?

correction!
But the NetBSD documentation seen as a whole shows deficiency.

Let's assume that I have a vision what I think would improve NetBSD
documentation because I did WWWs and wikis in my life, and I'm active
Internet user from 90s.

And tell me now please, with all my good will and the "wonderfull"
vision [ ;-) ] to whose doors I should knock at?

NetBSD Project's mailing list has forked into zillions subcategories.
In those circumstation I've chosen the only possible selection -
netbsd-users@(). What about netbsd-docs@? Is it equally "populated"?

Regards,
pp
--
Przemysław Pawełczyk <pp@kv.net.pl>

--Signature=_Sat__31_Mar_2007_08_31_29_-0500_8Khqy552pqW.5v7n
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFGDmKxD9+eS/1tsfYRAhN9AJ9P1zJHVgGXep5iB/EvHvFKvdvutwCgjcuT
7N7njBaVYBl4neMjkJiBb5I=
=jhDQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Sat__31_Mar_2007_08_31_29_-0500_8Khqy552pqW.5v7n--