Subject: Re: Proposition for Releases page changes
To: Peter I. Hansen <peterih@gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?UHJ6ZW15c8WCYXcgUGF3ZcWCY3p5aw==?= <pp@kv.net.pl>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 03/30/2007 05:58:00
--Signature=_Fri__30_Mar_2007_05_58_01_-0500_t7WftP65Nq6Ch=ks
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:54:28 +0200
"Peter I. Hansen" <peterih@gmail.com> wrote:

> I also like that. The page looks great now. Maybe you should write
> "unofficial" i bold?
Done.

> > What do you think if future discussions on documentation I would
> > denote in Subject field Call for docs: "a topic"?
>
> Could you rephrase this? I don't understand this at all...
I beg your pardon.
I want to ask community about next changes to documentation pages
which I think should be done. Every letter on the topic I want
to emphesize with following text in Subject e-mail field:
Call for docs: xxxxxx
where xxxxx would be title of the page pending changes or a few words
focusing on the changes.

Thanks for your voice.

BTW. The more I read the documentation which is responsible for
the first impressions the NetBSD website visitors may acquire, the
more I think it needs changes. I'm going to write about it to www
maintainers via "Contact us" service (feedback). What I think is that
NetBSD release 4.0 could be associated with some changes in WWW pages.
I'll present my suggestions here soon as well.

Regards,
pp

--
Przemysław Pawełczyk <pp@kv.net.pl>

--Signature=_Fri__30_Mar_2007_05_58_01_-0500_t7WftP65Nq6Ch=ks
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFGDO05D9+eS/1tsfYRAju2AJ9YyEEDJqIqi6VO01Ko8K/IvXP7wgCdF2S/
0az+5PpNj5uxH09UCJlj0bI=
=Qhcg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Fri__30_Mar_2007_05_58_01_-0500_t7WftP65Nq6Ch=ks--