--Signature=_Wed__28_Mar_2007_09_20_14_-0500_MK_LlykuVhmjSYoD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:03:19 +0200
Geert Hendrickx <ghen@telenet.be> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 08:18:44AM -0500, Przemys?aw Pawe?czyk wrote:
> > Wiki is a _reallity_, it's a _fact_, whether some of you like it or
> > not. Why don't make use of it?
>
> That's your opinion.  The way you present it doesn't make it look any
> more objective.

But of course! "That's my opinion". What with this excerpt above is
wrong? Did I lie with any of those words? And the question - most
neutral of neutrals. Would it be more "objective" if I said:

"I the dust in the wind apologize to most of you in the Court of
the NetBSD, for my insolence but wouldn't it be more appropriate for
the wiki to be declared that it exists in real? For those who felt
offended with my words I bow for hundreds times."

That's better?
pp
--
Przemysław Pawełczyk <pp@kv.net.pl>

--Signature=_Wed__28_Mar_2007_09_20_14_-0500_MK_LlykuVhmjSYoD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFGCnmeD9+eS/1tsfYRAuvmAJoCcpyIgUH03Co6aWw5OCvgteA0AQCeMy5k
6CXsw8VLxN9ehmpQHEZCWyE=
=PUiy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Wed__28_Mar_2007_09_20_14_-0500_MK_LlykuVhmjSYoD--