--Signature=_Thu__22_Mar_2007_06_49_08_-0500_eZtG7A5WV+v0o0ID
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:18:45 +0100 (CET)
Mark Weinem <mark.weinem@alumni.uni-due.de> wrote:

> > 3) And why there're no "current" binaries? My Celeron 400 flint is
> > not a match to Athlon/Xeon/Pentium 4000+ 203mm heavy cruiser
> > cannons, not mentioning X2/X4 406 mm battleship monsters.
>
> The binaries are created when pkgsrc is in a stable state. After
> pkgsrc were frozen for 2 weeks (to hunt most of the serious bugs
> out). As a bulk build could take two weeks or longer, the resulting
> binaries would not really be "current" anymore.

Thanks for your patience. As I stated clearly I cannot compile _every_ pkgsrc item. There're the items' maintainers. Why we cannot create "unofficial" ftp site with "current binaries"?

Partially tested current pkgsrc/binaries will improve NetBSD 4 better then NetBSD 4 Beta tested with packages-2006Q4 binaries.

Regards,
pp
--
Przemysław Pawełczyk <pp@kv.net.pl>

--Signature=_Thu__22_Mar_2007_06_49_08_-0500_eZtG7A5WV+v0o0ID
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFGAm00D9+eS/1tsfYRAmwGAJ9Ukv5gXHDO68a9aQ30A4kOvMal1ACeMS3L
wFHfDndkoy45T8pa9uzw/Bk=
=exsD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Thu__22_Mar_2007_06_49_08_-0500_eZtG7A5WV+v0o0ID--