On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:43:31AM +0100, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
> OK, so here's fourth one: instead of backgrounding fsck - to implement
> reiserfs 3.6.25.

I'm not sure whether porting ReiserFS 3.x is a good idea:
- It is no longer maintained by its author.
- It has known scalability problems.

SuSE Linux recently changed their default systems from ReiserFS to Ext3
for the above reasons.

	Kind regards

-- 
Matthias Scheler                                  http://zhadum.org.uk/