Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> "No way" isn't the most polite way to ask for help...  However -- look
> at your own output; in particular, notice the "XFree86".  When I look
> on my XFree86 machines, I see /usr/X11R6/bin/rman; in particular, my
> 3.1_STABLE machines show 3.0.8.  
> 
> Shall we wager where in your $PATH /usr/X11R6/bin and /usr/pkg/bin are?

Hi,
"No way" means for me "it can't be done", so it's far from impoliteness. 
But your next comment is a true "observation". As far as up to now I 
treated the system in rather holistic way in accordance with NetBSD hype 
about it compactness or coherentness. It have never come to my mind to 
treat the XFree86 as a separate part of the system. So when I looked on 
my XFree86 machine I saw /etc/X11 as a frontend to X Window System. I 
was wrong obviously. The implementation of /usr/pkg as an unique 
application directory is ingenious. But there should not be any 
ambiguity within the two separate lands of system and user.

What I hit during my work should be worked out but with deeper thought. 
Changing path to tkman path or sequence in system PATH is not the best 
solution.

Many thanks for your help and showing me new ways how to look at the 
Unix systems as such.

Regards,
pp

-- 
Przemysław Pawełczyk [pren. Pshemislav Paveltchik]
pp@kv.net.pl, http://pp.kv.net.pl