Subject: Re: amd64 stable for production ?
To: None <netbsd-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Quentin Garnier <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/12/2006 22:30:10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:20:45PM -0800, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2006, at 11:58 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> >>Counterexamples include Message-id =20
> >><email@example.com> which =20
> >>states: "I'd be interested in seeing numbers for the syscall =20
> >>latency, too."
> >>The latency of system calls involves a transition to kernel code =20
> >>by definition.
> >>Would you retract your claim, please?
> >This is not my message, I don't have a gmail account.
> I didn't say it was your message; it was a message from someone else, =20
FWIW, the said sentence did _not_ came from a gmail account. Unless
mutt is lying to me. If it is the case, it's one hell of a liar.
Quentin Garnier - firstname.lastname@example.org - cube@NetBSD.org
"You could have made it, spitting out benchmarks
Owe it to yourself not to fail"
Amplifico, Spitting Out Benchmarks, Hometakes Vol. 2, 2005.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----