This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig62F3B029AE4FDCE5BA6BC861
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Geert Hendrickx wrote:
>>    Statistically, what I'm about to say is completely worthless. But I=

>> still want to ask: Is anyone else here seeding these systems? Is so,
>> have you also noticed that approx 0 people have interest in NetBSD/amd=
64
>> (and it's a very good approximation, too), while amd64 is very popular=

>> (more popular than i386 versions) on the Linux side?
>=20
> No, you only noticed that approx 0 people have interest in NetBSD/amd64=

> *binaries*.

   Oh, that's one of the reasons I wrote: "Statistically, what I'm about
to say is completely worthless.". :-)

> I think the conclusion is that most amd64 users are building
> releases from source themselves, as an average amd64 box is faster than=
 an
> average i386 box.

   I'm sure this is a factor.

--=20
Kind regards,
Jan Danielsson



--------------enig62F3B029AE4FDCE5BA6BC861
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFFeBPTbgs4ia4rq9IRCoBNAJ9ybYnzyookNMXzUrJsGGwAWLsATgCeMxzU
TH+2BnGgSBjEF2ZeSn0FjjA=
=FgDb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig62F3B029AE4FDCE5BA6BC861--