Jan Danielsson wrote:
>    Not sure where I should be mentioning this, but since there's no
> netbsd-chat mailing list that I could find...
> 
>    I'm seeding (torrent)  NetBSD 3.1 i386 & amd64, also I'm seeding
> Ubuntu 6.06, i386 and amd64 and Fedora Code (Zod) for i386 and amd64. I
> have done so quite a while.
> 
>    Statistically, what I'm about to say is completely worthless. But I
> still want to ask: Is anyone else here seeding these systems? Is so,
> have you also noticed that approx 0 people have interest in NetBSD/amd64
> (and it's a very good approximation, too), while amd64 is very popular
> (more popular than i386 versions) on the Linux side?
> 

Hi Jan,

I'm only seeding NetBSD 3.1 (all archs), but no Linux so I can't 
compare. What I can give you is values for the downloads for NetBSD 3.1, 
maybe they help comparing.

I started running rtorrent on 24 Nov, 20:48.52. I seed all archs, I'll 
show the most downloaded.

i386cd-3.1.iso 207.7 MB Uploaded:  3031.6 MB
multi-cd1-3.1.iso 682.2 MB Uploaded:  1952.0 MB
sourcecd-3.1.iso 202.7 MB Uploaded:   412.3 MB
macppccd-3.1.iso 176.8 MB Uploaded:   335.9 MB
sparc64cd-3.1.iso 151.2 MB Uploaded:   316.0 MB
* amd64cd-3.1.iso 151.5 MB Uploaded:   152.3 MB
multi-cd2-3.1.iso 561.3 MB Uploaded:    64.9 MB

As you can see, amd64 is by far not _the_ most popular arch, downloaded 
by torrent :)

Wouter