Subject: Re: timing issue
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Michael van Elst <email@example.com>
Date: 11/19/2006 08:15:07
firstname.lastname@example.org (Christian Biere) writes:
>I think someone else wrote it but I can confirm it as well that the behaviour
>on -current is the same. This might not be the case for everyone of course.
>However, it seems you can't sleep less than about 15 ms.
We are waiting on the HZ clock, the minimum wait time is 1 tick.
Since the first measurement synchronizes us to 1 tick we get
"almost" 2 ticks delay for the subsequent calls. Pretty simple.
Michael van Elst
"A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."