Subject: Fw: Re: GTK inconsistency
To: None <email@example.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Przemys=B3aw_Pawe=B3czyk?= <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/13/2006 05:06:12
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Taking the advice seriously I'm posting my remarks and questions to port-i386@, netbsd-users@, and pkgsrc-users@ at the same time.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:24:02 +0100
From: Tobias Nygren <email@example.com>
To: Przemysław Pawełczyk <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: GTK inconsistency
I don't understand exactly what you're trying to get at,
but your inquiry is probably better suited for the pkgsrc-users@ list.
Przemysław Pawełczyk wrote:
> I badly need gtk:
> gtk+, gtk2
> themes collections
> gtk-engines, gtk2-engines (gtk-engines2)
> NetBSD offers Nedit (gtk+) and Sylpheed (gtk2). But there's no cohesive "politics" concerning the library subject on NetBSD side.
> This is there, that is here, etc. A few single themes will not resolve the inconsistency in GTK pkgs pool. IMHO we can observe total mish-mash. I should mix up all three BSDs to get what I need.
> I know all the works are being done on a voluntary basis but if some of you programmers cleaned up the mess I'd be gratefull and many of us would appreciate the job.
> You can compare binaries from three BSD systems using my "xBSD Binary File Index Browser"
> Przemysław Pawełczyk
> http://warpman.kv.net.pl - Warpman's WWW
http://warpman.kv.net.pl - Warpman's WWW
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----