Subject: Re: 3.1_STABLE issues
To: Louis Guillaume <lguillaume@berklee.edu>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 11/12/2006 00:16:24
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 09:56:24AM -0500, Louis Guillaume wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just a couple things I noticed after doing an upgrade to 3.1_STABLE.
> Probably just house-cleaning issues...
>
> 1. /etc/motd reports that it's a development version
> of the system (even after etcupdate and reboot).
> But it should probably report that the system is
> `Stable'.
>
> 2. /etc/postinstall still wants to fix obsolete by
> removing these files...
>
> # postinstall -s / -d / check obsolete
> Source directory: /
> (extracted from: /)
> Target directory: /
> obsolete check:
> Remove obsolete file /lib/libcrypto.so.2.1
> Remove obsolete file /lib/libm.so.0.2
> Remove obsolete file /lib/libm387.so.0.0
> Remove obsolete file /lib/libtermcap.so.0.5
> Remove obsolete link /lib/libtermlib.so.0.5
> Remove obsolete file /lib/libutil.so.7.6
> Remove obsolete link /usr/lib/libc.so.12.128.2
> Remove obsolete link /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.2.1
> Remove obsolete link /usr/lib/libm.so.0.2
> Remove obsolete link /usr/lib/libm387.so.0.0
> Remove obsolete file /usr/lib/libpcap.so.1.4
> Remove obsolete file /usr/lib/libssh.so.1.0.1
> Remove obsolete link /usr/lib/libtermcap.so.0.5
> Remove obsolete link /usr/lib/libtermlib.so.0.5
> Remove obsolete link /usr/lib/libutil.so.7.6
> postinstall checks passed:
> postinstall checks failed: obsolete
> To fix, run:
> /usr/sbin/postinstall -s / -d / fix obsolete
>
>
> ... which will break the system.
How will it break ? Don't you have other version of these librairies ?
--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--