Subject: Re: Getting the good bits into NetBSD
To: Timo Schoeler <email@example.com>
From: Stefan Bozhilov <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/04/2006 17:52:18
--- Timo Schoeler <email@example.com> wrote:
> thus Dieter spake:
> >> (NetBSD developers not committing code to fix
> bugs in
> >> NetBSD's tree but fixing them in Wasabi's).
> > This is exactly the type of thing that the GPL
> yes, but the price is high.
> > And one of the few things that Linux gets right
> that BSD
> > gets wrong. This is a major reason why Linux gets
> > much more corporate support than BSD. Company A
> > contribute things to Linux without worrying about
> Company B
> > taking them, adding Company B's ideas and selling
> > but not sharing the source for Company B's ideas
> with Company A.
> but that's not the problem here. that is what makes
> this issue
> extra-salty. it is about a company influencing a
I would disagree with both of you - the GPL is a dead
end license when applied to a kernel. Linux gets
attention from commercial companies because users
demand a better OS. But the commercial world handles
it with a lot of caution - as one would handle a bomb.
Oh, and the Linux kernel is influenced by the
companies involved with it. The Linux Kernel Mailing
List is a very interesting read. Reiser4 - Nope! ACPI
- Nope! Etc.
> > This also hurts BSD because BSD cannot use any
> source from Linux.
> i'd rather say it saves BSD. but this gets off topic
> too far. please
> let's focus on the problem here and not bring linux
> into the game...
> > So we have this situation where everyone else can
> take things
> > from BSD, but only rarely does anyone give
> anything back.
> this horse was beaten to death already.
> > And then people wonder why BSD doesn't have any
> [i wonder which features that linux might have
> (another question than
> is, do they function well? do they function at a
> certain stability?
> etc.) that BSD does not have. ISA TV card support in
> a server OS?]
> > Solution: Add the GPL to BSD.
> as already said, the problem is a different one.
> certainly it's also
> about the license, but mainly it's about morale. the
> important question
> is how deeply did corruption spread.
> (corruption is a hard word, but every other
> description of the problem
> TNF/TNP faces would have been an euphemism.)
Corruption has a clear legal meaning. There is nothing
of the sort here. Personal mistakes have been made and
I don't know enough to pass judgment. I think it's
pointless anyway. I would be interested to hear from
people who want to take the code a proceed in a better
way. Anything else is a waste of time.
> Timo Schoeler | http://riscworks.net/~tis |
> RISCworks -- Perfection is a powerful message
> ISP | POWER & PowerPC afficinados | Networking,
> Security, BSD services
> GPG Key fingerprint = B5F6 68A4 EC45 C309 6770 38C4
> 50E8 2740 9E0C F20A
> Frankie says: Relax
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around