thus Andy Ruhl spake:
> On 9/4/06, Timo Schoeler <timo.schoeler@riscworks.net> wrote:
>> al qaeda is an invention of the US and other imperialists to undermine
>> civil rights to ensure capitalism until the planet explodes.
>>
>> timo
> 
> That is so delusional that I don't even know how to respond.
> 
> You have absolutely no respect from me now.

cool, because i mentioned something not OT (al qaeda) and claimed 
there's no such thing. bingo, were in an axiomatic situation, as neither 
i can prove it does not exist nor that if it exists it is not 
sponsored/founded by guys based in the US (or GB, or...). on the other 
side, you cannot prove it exists. this leads to losing your respect. 
honestly, i really don't want your respect when basic discussion is able 
to throw it away. it can't be worth much.

> Back to the subject. Which seems to be moving toward the presence of
> unstable individuals 

like charles m. hannum, who caused a lot of waves throwing a 
non-existant (well, that's what a bunch of guys here states, at least) 
stone into water? :)

> who respond to this list.
> 
> Andy

timo (watching this list, having popcorn, beer and listening to nice 
music :)