> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 01:40:02AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > I assume you're talking about the developer agreement, because as far as
> > I'm aware you know precisely as much about the agreement with USL as I
> > do, and there is certainly nothing in my statement about it which is
> > "hogwash".  
 
"Charles M. Hannum" <mycroft@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> Yes, I'm sure you were around to talk about it when it was signed.  Not.
> Please keep your ignorance to yourself.

Wikipedia article about the suit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USL_v._BSDi

 Text of settlement agreement at groklaw (linked to from wikipedia article):
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20041126130302760

Earliest post to a NetBSD list i can find with TLS' name on it:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-pmax/1993/12/21/0000.html

According to Groklaw, the agreement is dated 4 Feb 1994.

Accordint to the NetBSD mailing list archives, the message from TLS is
dated 21 December 1993.

 Could you elaborate on your assertion that TLS "[was not] around
to talk about it when it was signed," or comment on the veracity of the
sources above?


 -johan